The religion should exist as a pathway for peace when time arises for greater conflict. I only made an attempt to ponder at our reactions when our faith, the God we believe in, or our traditions are questioned by someone who is not in our group. The response to that “someone” who is ignorant or intellect is having a dialog – face to face or through media he can be reached at. My fellow beings in the religion I believe in – that is Christianity – should be tolerant to criticisms, to understand our own pitfalls and make corrections.
vpallathu,
I quoted the below from your web site. You are saying Hindu is not tolerant and Christians should be tolerant etc…
——————————————————————-
A book sold at Padmasri MA Thomas’ Emmanuel Mission created much hatred from Hindus in general in India. A lot of negative depictions of Hindu Gods in the book affected MA Thomas’s work – his son was arrested, and Mr.Thomas had to go into hiding. Are Hindus tolerant? They may be not. The Muslims were neither tolerant – the book ‘Satanic Verses’ caused a lot of hatred. People died in riots after some cartoons of Muhammad appeared in a Danish news papers, and the people took the hatred to the streets
——————————————————————-Here M A Thomas and Mathew are the only showing their hatred. Have you read this book? The book is full of hatred towards Hindu religion and their belief.
The difference between Da Vinci Code and Haqeeqat is, Da Vinci code is writtent by a Christian himself and he is claiming his reserach studies are accurate and he has nothing to do with other religion…….
Haqeeqat is a pure form of hatred and is aiming at Hindus and the purpose is to use it against the religion so that some conversions will be made easy…. It is written by a fanatic Christian evangelist (and you quoted the names and know better..)
Could you now remove or change your writing in your blog?